Email and Bacon
Android Postive - a back button that works
App Store vs Market - the problem with Android
Random Android experience 1 - software
30 Days with Android - Part 1

Well, I have decided to embark on a bold experiment and have put the iPhone away for the next 30 days. During this time I will be using an AT&T Android phone, the Motorola Backflip. Why this phone? Well, I don't have the resources to get another new service plan from Verizon or Sprint so their decidedly better products are not within reach for this test. So I start out at a disadvantage in that my Android hardware will be running v1.5 of the OS. But this is actually a good real world test, because according to many net statistics, close to 25% of the installed Android base is still on this version.
Which brings me to point one that is immediately noticeable when you switch from the consistency of the iPhone to Android - there are a lot (and I do mean a lot) of phone, OS and carrier options and all of them are different. Now some would argue that this is a benefit in that you are not locked into one hardware or software manufacturer or even one carrier. But this "freedom" definitely comes at a price - the loss of consistency.
The Hardware
After settling on the hardware, I made the mistake of reading the online reviews for the Motorola Backflip. A majority of them are horrible. Most people hate this phone, primarily due to the old OS version or the fact that it is on AT&T. So before even getting the phone, I was afraid I had made a bad choice. I also spent an hour or two on the Motorola site, reading about Motoblur and its great back-up, remote wipe and restore features. I also spent some time with the Quick Start and User's Guide PDFs (yes, I am probably the only geek who still likes to read manuals), so by the time the phone arrived, I was fully versed in what it looked like, how it worked and how to configure it out of the box.
Overall, Motorola still makes a nice phone. It's build quality is solid with no creaking or cheap feel to the case. The screen is bright and sharp and while the resolution is not as high as other Android models, the smaller screen makes it feel sharper and the text smoother. A subjective view, but I look the look of the fonts and icons and it is on par with my 3G.
The phone works in both a portrait mode (ala iPhone) and a landscape mode that happens when you "flip" open the keyboard. Out of the box, the auto-rotation of the screen is turned off, so at first you're thinking, what the heck is wrong with my broken phone? The screen won't rotate! Once you turn this feature on, the second thing you notice is that the screen only rotates when in certain applications. For example, it won't rotate when looking at the home pages. Weird, and a perfect example of the weirdness that is Android OS (or maybe its just my hardware, who knows - and why should it matter - it's still odd).

The keyboard is not nearly as bad as reviews would have you believe. One reviewer actually complained it was too big. Not sure about that. Certainly, the membrane style keys are reminiscent of a TI-99 (if you are old enough to remember that one, raise your now arthritic right hand please) or Atari 400 (wow, he's diggin deep now folks). But it is good enough, and for most tasks I found the onscreen keyboard works well enough to keep me from even using the "real" keyboard.
If you come from the iPhone, the first thing you will hate is the Home button. I have lost count of the number of times I have pressed it to turn the phone on from sleep or to do any number of things that an iPhone does. But I am sure with time (at least 27 more days) I should get used to the button layout and overall interface differences.
The camera is quite nice. It's a 5MP sensor with good responsiveness and autofocus. It's essentially like any point and shoot from a few years ago and does a good job with compression and color balance. The video function is sub par and I probably would never use it for anything. The sucky part is that it has the potential to be used for video conferencing as it becomes front facing with the keyboard in "open" position. But there is neither software to make it so, nor probably the hardware power to pull it off.
Overall, the form factor is nice, the phone feels good in your hand (and in your pockets) and it is neither too light nor too heavy for extended use. I would rather spend the time the next few weeks talking about the software and the overal experience it created rather than just focus on the hardware's limitations. Unlike the iPhone experience, the software and hardware you are "stuck" with is not always your choice and this will become a theme as I start to take apart this experience over the next several reviews. So far, I have been able to figure out all the buttons and hardware features. Next review will be spent diving into software. I am slowly cobbling together the equivalent apps I have on the iPhone and have only found a few gaps in coverage (PocketMoney, a native Twitter app that runs on OS 1.5 and a Buzz app of any kind). I have to say that I am looking forward to spending some time in this platform and telling you all about it. So join me next time as we start dissecting the user experience that is Android software.
Set the wayback machine to 2000!
My long time friend Jim Kelleher @kellehercreat shared this image of his Newton MessagePad 2100 still running and still housing my old Apple contact record after all these years. I had to share this piece of history - I occasionally miss the old days with my trusty Newton (remember the clear ones they gave away at Apple Power Camp in 1996?) . PS - follow Jim on Posterous for cool creative content, tips and articles. http://jimk.posterous.com/
Android 2.2 upgrade list: Is your phone getting Froyo? - Computerworld Blogs

After I was done musing on the state of Android on my tech blog tonight, http://bit.ly/9Oipdm, I decided to research what exactly could be run on each of the Android devices. In my opinion, there are simply too many devices and OS versions. This article is a good round up of when you can expect 2.2 (in same cases, don't hold your breath, you are at the mercy of not only a phone manufacturer, but the carrier too).
Superfeedr in ping.fm
Playing around with feeds and real time posts with Feedburner tonight and came across Superfeedr within ping.fm. Not sure how it will compare to the built in Twitter feed capability in Feedburner so testing it out with this post.
It's interesting how much overlap seems to exist between all these publishing tools. Finding the right mix in your workflow is challenging. But somehow still fun. I am really digging ping.fm for its ability to update my microblogs. Not really using it for blogging though, maybe some day.
Really liking the scripting.com makeover
There are some blog sites that I loathe but I visit them anyway because I have to. Then there are sites I love because of the way they present information. They don't have long articles, but they have meaningful and inspiring posts. They come from people who really know their stuff and express it well. And generally, these are people I have followed for a long long time. One such site that recently had a little makeover is Dave Winer's Scripting.com. I have been following Dave since back when I worked at Kinko's in the 90's. Back then I followed Dave for his Userland product. It was nothing short of amazing and one of the first true "publishing" tools before blogging really meant anything.
I have followed Dave on and off for many years since then and recently was struck by the elegance and simplicity of his site redesign - a simple focus on making the site look better on mobile platforms with collapsible posts and the same clean design he seems to have used for years. I like the simplicity of the design which favors content over flash (figurative and literal). I can always count on a post that makes me think, and for that I am thankful for Dave and other's like him who publish.
If you have not checked this site out I highly recommend bookmarking it. You won't be disappointed.
Apple's New Safari Browser v5.0 - first impressions

The all new Safari may not have been a topic covered in the "Stevenote" this afternoon, but it has been released today just like the rumors indicated it might. This new version is even better and faster than 4.0, is optimized for HTML 5 and has improced Javascript performance. Cross platform for Mac and PC.
One of the cool new features that has been a big negative in previous versions is the handling of new tabs. In version 4 and earlier, opening some links would spawn a new Safari window instead of a tab. Now, you can set a preference to automatically open a tab instead. This is more in line with the behavior of Firefox and Chrome and makes the Safari experience much better and consistent with other browsers (especially on a Windows PC).
Another interesting addition is the appearance of Bing in the search engine selections under Preferences. In the past only Yahoo and Google were available. This is in line with the new iOS4 selections shown today at WWDC. I have not had a lot of play time with Bing but a lot of folks seem to like it and I may give it a try to see what the experience is like in Safari.
Safari is also being touted as the best browser to view HTML5 content. In fact, a recent post by Apple which I featured here on ChrisPosterous highlights the use of HTML5 for advanced web functionality and requires Safari. With 5.0, that experience is noticeably faster, at least on the Windows platform.
Though I have not played with it yet, the new Safari is also said to sport an improved RSS reader. To be honest, I have never been a fan of using Safari for RSS reading. Going back to version 1 the experience has been odd. When I click on an RSS feed link, I expect to get a subscribe dialog so I can through the feed into Google Reader. The fact that Safari just opens the same site in an ugly window is horrible. I will try the new reader feature, but I don't expect I will be giving up my Google reader any time soon.
The last thing that was supposed to be in Safari but has not been released yet is support for extensions. According to Apple, developers can begin developing extensions for Safari now and this summer a new Extensions Gallery will become available for all users.
So far the overall experience is great. Safari has taken another step toward being a great fast browser and frankly, the performance on my PC is as fast if not faster than Google Chrome. I no longer use Firefox or IE as they are just not even close in performance to the two Webkit based browsers. For now, Chrome has the advantage with its outstanding bookmark sync, extensions management and user interface (yes, I actually like the Chrome interface better under Win 7 than Safari - although font rendering under Safari is still superior in some respects). But I may find myself using Safari more with version 5 and certainly I am looking forward to seeing what happens in that Extensions space.


